What’s wrong with Secretary Kim 2024? This question has been on the minds of many fans and critics alike as the highly anticipated sequel to the 2016 hit film “What’s Wrong with Secretary Kim” finally arrives. The original film, directed by Park Hoon-jung, was a blend of romance, comedy, and office politics, captivating audiences with its unique blend of humor and heartwarming moments. However, as we delve into the sequel, it becomes apparent that there are several issues that need to be addressed.
Firstly, the plot of “What’s Wrong with Secretary Kim 2024” seems to lack the originality that made its predecessor so engaging. While the first film focused on the blossoming relationship between the protagonist, Kim Mi-ryeong, and her boss, Kim Dong-woo, the sequel seems to struggle to find a fresh angle. The story revolves around the characters’ lives five years after the events of the first film, but the narrative fails to offer any significant development or change in their dynamic. This lack of progression can be quite frustrating for viewers who were hoping for a more compelling continuation of the story.
Secondly, the character development in “What’s Wrong with Secretary Kim 2024” is underwhelming. The characters from the first film were well-crafted and relatable, making it easy for audiences to connect with them. However, in the sequel, the characters seem to be one-dimensional and lack the depth that made them so memorable. This is particularly evident in the portrayal of the lead characters, who fail to evoke the same level of emotional investment from the audience. The lack of character growth and development is a significant drawback in what could have been a compelling sequel.
Another issue with “What’s Wrong with Secretary Kim 2024” is the film’s pacing. The original film was well-paced, balancing the comedic and romantic elements without overwhelming either aspect. Unfortunately, the sequel struggles to maintain this balance, often feeling disjointed and rushed. This disjointed pacing makes it difficult for viewers to become fully immersed in the story, as the film seems to jump from one scene to another without providing enough time for the audience to connect with the characters or understand the plot.
Lastly, the film’s humor falls flat in several instances. While the original film was known for its witty and sharp comedy, the sequel often relies on slapstick and low-brow humor, which fails to resonate with the audience. This shift in humor style is a noticeable change from the original film and can be quite jarring for fans who appreciated the clever and nuanced humor of the first installment.
In conclusion, “What’s Wrong with Secretary Kim 2024” faces several challenges that hinder its potential as a worthy sequel. The lack of originality, underdeveloped characters, pacing issues, and a shift in humor style all contribute to a film that falls short of the expectations set by its predecessor. While the film still has its moments of charm and entertainment, it ultimately fails to live up to the high standards set by “What’s Wrong with Secretary Kim.” It remains to be seen whether the franchise can recover from this underwhelming sequel and deliver a worthy continuation of the story.
